Updated Interview Framework

Extracting Your Brand Narrative

Your Personal Branding Guidelines emphasize that strong executive brands answer four core questions:

  1. Who am I to my audience?
  2. What am I known for?
  3. What do I stand for?
  4. Who am I NOT?

The guide also states: "Show what you know — and how you think" and "If it doesn't teach, clarify, or connect — it doesn't belong."

Let me restructure my interview to extract not just your expertise, but your brand narrative — the story of how you think, what you care about, and the value you create.

Section 1: Identity (Who You Are TO Your Audience)

Not what you hope they say. What do they actually say based on feedback you've received? (e.g., "He simplifies the technical stuff...")

This reveals your credibility niche. (e.g., "Tell us the truth about our current architecture", "Navigate vendor politics without bias"...)

Be specific. Describe the scenario. This is your differentiation moment. (e.g., "Is it when you challenge their assumptions?", "When you translate vendor speak into business terms?").

Section 2: Expertise (What You're Known For — Proven by Evidence)

What's the non-obvious insight? (e.g., "Most enterprises don't have a technology problem, they have a decision-making problem").

From your Financial Services, Energy, Media projects — what's the common pattern? (e.g., "Every industry struggles with centralised vs federated IT...").

What mental model or framework do they take away? This is your teaching legacy. (e.g., "They stop asking 'what platform' and start asking 'what capability'").

Section 3: Method (How You Think — Your Intellectual Property)

What are your signature questions? (e.g., "What decision is this technology supposed to enable?", "What happens if you wait six months to decide?").

Walk me through it step-by-step. This shows how you think. (e.g., "1. First, I did [X] because I needed to understand [Y]...").

Is there a Marcus Bearden Framework™? (e.g., "A specific way you map build vs buy vs blend decisions", "A maturity model for AI governance").

Section 4: Values (What You Stand For)

These reveal your values. (e.g., "Technology decisions made without understanding business impact", "Enterprises adopting AI because of FOMO...").

This reveals your intrinsic motivation. (e.g., "I like solving different problems...", "I get bored with steady-state operations").

This reveals your purpose beyond billing. (e.g., "CIOs can navigate AI adoption without vendor hype...", "Sovereignty is understood as a spectrum...").

Section 5: Boundaries (Who You Are NOT)

(e.g., "Do you turn down pure implementation work?", "Do you avoid vendor-funded 'advisory'...?").

(e.g., "I'm not a futurist predicting trends", "I'm not a hands-on architect writing code"...)

This defines your brand boundaries. (e.g., "Recommending a solution because it's billable, not right", "Using buzzwords you don't believe in"...)

Section 6: Narrative Arc (Your Story)

What's the narrative thread? (e.g., "I've always been solving the same problem... the technology just keeps changing").

What was your moment? (e.g., "A project where your strategic framing mattered more...", "A client who kept bringing you back for advice...").

What's your signature language? (e.g., "build vs buy vs blend", "simplify the complex"...)

Section 7: Voice and Presence (How You Show Up)

Version A: "Organizations often struggle with cloud cost optimization due to inadequate visibility into resource utilization patterns and insufficient governance frameworks, requiring strategic intervention to align technical architecture with business objectives." Version B: "Most cloud cost problems aren't technical. You're spending £2M more than you should because no one knows which teams own which resources, and no one wants to be the person who shuts down someone else's environment." Which is closer? Version A, Version B, or something in between?

This reveals your communication style. (e.g., "Start with a provocative question", "Show a surprising data point", "Tell a story about another client's mistake"...)

Section 8: Legacy and Long-term Brand

Be specific. (e.g., "Known for helping Global 2000 enterprises avoid vendor lock-in...", "Created the [X Framework] for AI governance...").

This reveals your growth direction. (e.g., "More about AI adoption psychology...?", "More about emerging sovereignty models...?").

This forces you to distill your message. (e.g., "Build, Buy, or Blend: ...", "Beyond Hype: A CIO's Guide...").